A personal look at two classics from Rick Hinderer
Alright, alright – I admit it. Presenting this claim as an absolute truth would obviously be nonsense. And yet, that’s exactly my completely subjective impression.
A quick look in the rearview mirror of knife history helps to add a little context.
The Eklipse is of course a genuine Rick Hinderer design, but it was initially marketed by Zero Tolerance under the name ZT 0393. So we’re talking about a knife that is roughly from the same design era as the iconic XM-18.
Personally, I’ve never owned a ZT 0393, but I have owned several XM-18 variants as well as multiple Hinderer Eklipse models.
I would describe both knives as absolute workhorses – which certainly reflects the professional background of their designer. Rick Hinderer spent many years as a firefighter and has always approached tools from the perspective of the user: tools that must work instantly, even under stress and while wearing gloves.
Tools have to work. Immediately.
This exact mindset is what gave birth to the XM-18, which today is rightly considered a modern classic among American EDC folders.
But if you take a closer look, it becomes clear that with the Eklipse, Rick Hinderer may have pushed many of those ideas even further.
Especially in the current version with the Slicer blade and hollow grind, he may have outdone himself.
The most noticeable difference between the XM-18 and the Eklipse lies in the handle.
While the XM-18 features a strongly curved shape that guides the hand into a very specific position, the handle of the Eklipse is much more linear in its design.
This shape doesn’t force my hand into a single grip position but instead allows for several different grip styles.
In practice, this feels much freer and more natural to me—especially during longer cutting tasks or when you frequently reposition the knife in hand.
The Eklipse adapts to the hand, not the other way around.
And that’s exactly what makes it such a convincing tool for me.
Another detail that makes a big difference for me in actual use is the thumb recess just below the flipper on the top of the handle scales.
It gives the thumb plenty of room and provides a secure, controlled grip without feeling like I have to fight the knife to maintain control.
Especially in a forward grip, the Eklipse really shows its strength here and provides a very high level of control and confidence.
This thumb ramp isn’t just a visual feature—it’s a thoughtfully designed functional element.
And honestly, once you get used to it, you really don’t want to be without it anymore.
In the Slicer blade version discussed here, the Eklipse also does away with a pronounced forward choil.
As a result, the cutting edge moves a few millimeters closer to the handle.
The result is noticeably better power transfer, since you are working closer to the edge and lose less leverage.
When carving, performing controlled push cuts, or doing precise work, the knife feels more direct and efficient than an XM-18 with a large choil.
What sounds like a small difference on paper becomes very noticeable in real-world use.
Particularly interesting is the new hollow grind used on this version of the Eklipse blade.
The grind features a relatively large radius and therefore combines two characteristics that are often at odds with each other.
On the one hand, the blade cuts significantly better than the thicker Spanto grind and glides cleanly through wood, cardboard, and other everyday materials.
On the other hand, enough material remains behind the edge to maintain the typical Hinderer toughness.
This means the Eklipse never feels fragile or delicate— it remains a true workhorse with noticeably improved cutting performance.
Of course, the Eklipse clearly carries the signature of Rick Hinderer.
The blade made from CPM-S45VN, the modern successor to S35VN, offers an excellent combination of edge retention, corrosion resistance, and toughness.
Another typical feature of Hinderer folders is the Tri-Way Pivot System. It allows the user to decide whether the knife runs on ball bearings, bronze washers, or nylon washers.
Hot take: I personally am actually a fan of the nylon washers. That slightly dampened action somehow feels very “Hinderer” to me.
Functionally, all three options do an excellent job—this really comes down to personal preference.
And of course, aesthetics also play a role. I’m personally drawn to the straight lines of the handle and the elegant Slicer blade.
Add to that the consistent finish of the blade and titanium frame, and for me it’s an absolute homerun.
In the end, the Eklipse is not louder, not more iconic, and certainly not as well known as the XM-18.
But in the aspects described above, I find it more consistently thought out, freer in handling, and closer to the core idea of a true working tool.
Which is why, as someone who has used both knives, I say:
For me, the better XM-18 is the Eklipse.
Both the XM-18 and the Eklipse are among the most recognizable designs by Rick Hinderer. The two knives share many technical features, but differ noticeably in their ergonomics.
The Hinderer Eklipse at Knife Lounge